Commercial Property Boots Quits Welfare to Work Programme

Posted on 5 March, 2012 by Neil Bird

A Government scheme designed to help the long term unemployed back into work is under the spotlight following the withdrawal of commercial property retailer Boots. This is the second of the Government’s flagship welfare schemes to run into trouble in a week. Only days ago the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) was forced into a u-turn over plans to withdraw benefits from young job seekers declining offers of unpaid work experience. This followed the withdrawal of several high profile companies amid criticism that the scheme was little more than slave labour.

Boots says it will be offering no more placements on the programme for the long term unemployed because of the element of compulsion involved. Under DWP rules job seekers can have their benefits cut if they refuse to participate in the scheme. Boots isn’t the first company to withdraw from this programme but joins Burger King, Tesco and other commercial properties in disassociating itself from Government welfare policy.

In a statement Boots said it had previously offered placements in its commercial properties but it was company policy never to participate in schemes that compel people to work. As a result “It would no longer be offering any new placements,” the statement concluded. A Spokesperson for the Employment Related Services Association (ERSA), which delivers the programme on behalf of the Government, expressed disappointment in Boots decision, saying; “I think it’s a real shame. I think it’s a bit of an over-reaction from Boots.”


The latest blow to the Government comes amid growing controversy over its Welfare to Work programme. The Guardian recently uncovered that AVANTA, a provider of serviced offices and a major Government contractor, has compelled job seekers to clean its offices under the programme. The evidence also suggests that some companies have been cutting overtime and replacing temporary staff with unpaid job seekers. The Guardian also alleges that another participant, A4E, had forced the unemployed to work in its own offices.

The programme for the long term unemployed was launched in June 2011 and job seekers are referred to the agency by Job Centre Plus. Recent statistics from the DWP point to the number of referrals being higher than anticipated although some participating businesses claim not to have received a single referral.

Following the controversy surrounding its scheme for 18-24 year olds, the danger for the Government is that this programme also becomes discredited. If the public perception is that the scheme is designed to punish the unemployed and provide free labour to business, other commercial properties could follow Boots in withdrawing their participation. This would seriously undermine the government’s welfare policy and prove embarrassing to the Prime Minister who has publicly supported the programme.




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


Recent Posts

Interest Rates Impact on Commercial Property

Commercial Property Investment Outlook for 2023

The best places to stay on the Riviera

The latest property data has identified Newquay as the fastest property seller’s market in the UK

Investing in your garden can increase your property’s value

French Riviera temping high-end homebuyers

How can the ownership rights of my commercial property impact a business sale?

Should I incorporate virtual property viewings permanently?

Investment expected to increase across Asia-Pacific in 2021

UK property industry slows as the conclusion of tax break looms

BNP Paribas cautioned investors on Friday as debt-trading bonanza that increased its earnings this past year

Over 300,000 property purchases fell through in 2020 – we show the most frequent motives and the best way to get your house sale back on track

House Prices in the Capital Surpass £500,000

Optimism from the Bank of England’s chief economist

The most expensive commercial properties.

Businesses operating from shared premises will miss out on grants